An application made by Intel to cancel an order that requires the chip manufacturer to pay $ 2.1800mn to VLSI technology has been rejected by an US judge. UU
As reported by Reuters, the US District Judge UU Alan Alan Alan Alan Alan, in Waco, Texas has denied the company’s motion for a new trial in a recent sealing order.
We have gathered a list of the best portable business computers available.These are the best work stations on the market for professionals.
Do you need something more portable? Check out the best mobile work stations
In March, VLSI received $ 1,500 million and $ 675 million for two patents that Intel had infringed. The first patent, US7725759B2, deals with the clock management speed on an electronic device and was originally developed by Sigmatel, while the second patent, US7523373B2, which describes a minimum memory operation voltage technique, was originally developed by Freescale.
Intention to appeal
In an Intel statement launched after Judge Albright denied his movement for a new trial, the company said it was disappointed with the decision and will attract it.
However, the chip giant also requested reforms to stop the “litigation investors” to use low quality patents to extract “exorbitant” damage of itself and other large companies, since these practices suffocate innovation and hurt the economy .
When Intel sought for the first time a new trial in the case, the reasoning of the company behind doing so was due to how it believed that the verdict was contaminated by incorrect jury instructions and penitentiary resolutions that were based on the previous settlements of Intel. Intel also raised the fact that the verdict was the second largest by a jury in a patent case and that the other three larger verdicts had been annulled by unemployed judgments.
It seems that the patent demands ongoing between Intel and VLSI have not finished yet and, it is likely to be discovered more once the chip manufacturer presents its appeal.
